28.10.06

THE LETTING GO: How One's Passion Sets In Motion The Passion Of Others

"The phenomenological world is not the bringing to explicit expression of a pre-existing being, but the laying down of being. Philosophy is not the reflection of a pre-existent truth but, like art, the act of bringing truth into being. No explanatory hypothesis is clearer than the act whereby we take up this unfinished world in an effort to complete and conceive it."
--M. Merleau-Ponty,
The Phenomenology of Perception

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Above: David Audet in Ybor Square Space

When I was eight years old, I was young,
and I was shy. On the last day of school
I asked my art teacher to sign my yearbook,
standing out among the live oak trees,
out where we had spun clay until
our hands were dry and chalky
like the hands of gymnasts.

David pressed hard with my neon pen, leaving bold-faced
indentions upon the glossy paper. He haphazardly
scribbled and handed it over, and of course
I eagerly flipped around to find his signature before walking away.
He had given himself a beard and mustache
in his photograph. He had written

YOU'VE GOT IT / IF YOU WANT IT.

While I was reading before him
David verbally reiterated his note,
eyes catching me instructively,
holding me for a moment.
I understood, right?

I HAVE IT IF I WANT IT. BUT
I HAVE TO WANT IT.

And yes, I said of course.
Yes of course.

David Audet is the best art teacher
I think I've ever had. He had eyes
disproportionately keener than the rest of his body,
which was husky, unshaven, unkempt.
He arranged art galleries exhibiting
stale Cuban sandwiches. He constantly reeked
of body odor. He had built a deck, gingerly, around
the old oak trees to hold classes. He would simply
sit in the center of this deck with us circled around
him, and play guitar while the peacocks screamed
in circles, around us. He would have us draw him
in bursts of sixty seconds and then have us rotate,
cyclical, around one another to capture all angles.

When it rained we cried out and ran inside.
We would go into small unused rooms, smelling him
and listening to him telling us how the government had
assassinated John Lennon until the situation was too
repugnant for there to be room in it for our juvenile art.
David was prone to bursts of violent rage at his young
students. Eventually the school dismissed him, hired him
back, and dismissed him again. One wants to attribute this
either to his memories of the Vietnam War or to his
perennial occupational overexposure to paint thinner.

David Audet loved to eat avocado sandwiches and
in class he would eat them as he taught us to cast
pottery in the traditional Raku style.
Sen-No-Rikyu.
David was too big in himself to fit neatly anywhere.
Even Lee Academy was too much for him. The school,
which it would admittedly be quite an understatement
to say was not the most oppressive I've encountered,
could not contain the firing glazes which interested him,
and glittered.

YOU'VE GOT IT / IF YOU WANT IT.

If his note in my yearbook had read
IF YOU WANT IT / YOU'VE GOT IT,
David would have entered the fallible
sphere of logic which his statement preexists.
But no -- his area of expertise was precisely
the precognitive moment of inspiration where the question is not,
"How best can we analyze this?"
no -- David asks, in true form for the visual artist,

"WHY WOULD ONE WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE
THE EXISTENCE OF OBJECTS WORTH ANALYSIS, AT ALL?"


The realm where possibility is made actual
does not rest in the dry and stiffened fingertips
of some absolute objective truth which existed fully formed
thousands of years ago as it stands dusty, before me now --
no. "The only pre-existent Logos is the world itself."
This sphere begins entirely frothing in liquid slip, fires precisely
in the lowest temperatures of my immediate,
glittering desire. Here the genesis of meaning --
And here the condemnation of meaning,
Fissures caused by air and water in the clay,
As banal and violent as an act validated in its own performance.
Upon the littlest effort it takes for my fingers to wield their water
over the indentions in lumps of pliable earth, fanning and smoothing the
Thing into Being -- upon this depends the very being of the tradition itself.

Soren Kierkegaard says: life is lived forwards but
understood backwards. I had always contested this.
But what if memory were found to be like the heat left in an object
long after the fire has gone -- the residual glow of ceramic sake-cups
and pitchers, indelibly, only there after they have left the kiln.
Then we could only understand the past. David Audet's influence was to
plunge us all the more, in spite of history, into the
establishing values for the future. He became our personal history so that
when we were adults, then we might turn our heads
over our shoulders
like someone who just saw a friend walk past in a crowd.

I could not have fathomed it then, age seven,
face covered in white paint, hands covered in dust
and chalky like the hands of gymnasts.
Only over time did the man grow to glow
with a phenomenological heat. Only now I begin
chipping slow flecks off the marble
of what I learned there, still covered in paint,
David still living by the lake in a trailer next door.

25.10.06

A PRELUDE TO THE LETTING GO

Though you wipe your hands and brush off the dust and dirt from the vessels, what is the use of all this fuss if the heart is still impure?

Sen-No-Rikyu


| re: machines rendering manual labor unnecessary - the difference is that the upper classes always gained reactive identity by way of a condescension toward those who did their bodily labor, be they african-american slaves, the proletariat, or women. one cannot in the same way condescend to a machine, and thus the reactivity by which we tried to assert our detached superiority over the body disappears, for it no longer has a subject-as-object upon which to displace/inflict its gaze -- only mere objects -- indeed the objects for which the oppressed classes have, throughout history, shed inexhaustible torrents of blood.

| re: what happens when the detachment from modes of power which is necessary for any true criticism & radical rennovation of values to take place does not coincide the establishment and affirmation of positive alternative values -- those who would be radicals are powerless, and become rematriculated into original power structures as members of lowest, most oppressed class; they go to jail, they become impoverished and marginalized. thus we reject the ascetic denial of power. BUT the most radical revolutionary will be a conservative the day after the revolution.


Though you wipe your hands and brush off the dust and dirt from the vessels, what is the use of all this fuss if the heart is still impure?

Sen-No-Rikyu

13.10.06

What's going to be the death of me? Static electricity.

Why does a house cat, when it is left outside, invariably come back to its master? Cats do not think of us as a part of their "pack" -- they are, allegedly, "not social animals." Even when they do stay with us their independence, to say nothing of the real neuroses some domesticated animals (caged birds...) display, assures us that it is only out of a lack of alternatives. That is precisely it. A cat who escapes comes back when it realizes that it prefers regular meals, albeit regular meals in servitude. It does not want the freedom to starve, and the ones who do -- well, they drop off our radar. And thusly do we construct the universality of our sovereignty.

Thusly do women remain oppressed. There are other options, of course -- last time I checked, women did have the option to get paid for their jobs. And last time I checked women get paid on average half what men do for comparable work. We will continue to accept the dinner offers of traditional gentlemen so long as that is the most certain way to ensure a regular meal. Men don't have the option of such dependence at all, but women -- well, it's unfortunate, but you know how things are. These days, nobody much looks out for the strays.

10.10.06

Miss Madonna, won't you give me a kiss.

i. days need yet to begin

as life begins, unconscious,

so that waking is intuitive

and shortly after the day's light -- discrete

from the clock-tick of day.

this day has yet begun as

a weathered and phlegmatic exhale

after the exhaustion that results,

incomparably,

from a day full, without exertion.


ii. If we do not know ourselves to have a culture on par with Ancient Greece, if we cannot properly revel in our passions in the sphere of some ideal, then it is because the Greeks, and the ideal, have already been historicized. All understanding moves against the current in this way, and before we ever had occasion to claim lack, this responsibility should have been obvious. Since, by looking at our demographic's deep dissatisfation with the current state of American culture, we know that it was not, we have occasion to identify yet another failure of modernization, of the democratic state, of the herd. The failing is precisely when our ignorance of our own power becomes, effectively, the lack of power. Like the joke about red ink in the Zizek film -- we have all become culturally indolent by way of the formative effects of totalizing homogenization in media. If some cultural practice has not been presented to us, prefabricated and preordained, by some media, well then we imagine at the very least that it must be strictly taboo -- or, most often, that it does not exist at all. This betrays a fundamental existential ignorance, or a similarly fundamental laziness -- either way, an irresponsibility toward the care of the self. The next question that we ask -- well, what does historicizing do, anyway, so that we might ourselves? What is recollection in its transfigurative power, and how does one seize it as one chooses and acts? This question is not asking for proof of possibility, for it already has that powdering its very bones. Rather, it asks for the greatest absurdity when we are working in such a general & abstract conceptual framework -- it asks for self-disclosure to come from an outside source.

iii. "You are standing as if on the summit of the Mount of Transfiguration and must depart -- but then all the little demands of finitude and the petty debts owed the greengrocer, the shoemaker, and the tailor take hold of you and the final result is that you remain earthbound and you are not transfigured, but the Mount of the Transfiguration is transfigured and becomes a dunghill." / "Close air always becomes noxious."